ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM IN ADULT EDUCATION USING DISTANCE LEARNING FOR LEARNING PROGRAMMING

Authors

  • Mario Kraml Pädagogische Hochschule Oberösterreich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/ephijer.v8i1.109

Keywords:

flipped classroom, adult education, programming learning, distance education, active learning

Abstract

The flipped classroom model has emerged as an innovative approach to education, particularly gaining traction in adult education and distance learning contexts. This pedagogical framework reverses the traditional classroom structure, encouraging students to engage in self-directed learning at home while reserving class time for interactive activities and collaborative projects. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the advantages and disadvantages of the flipped classroom model, particularly focusing on its application in adult education, programming learning, and distance education. Five key themes emerge from the discussion: flexibility, personalized learning, active engagement, technology reliance, and assessment challenges. While the flipped classroom offers benefits such as flexibility in scheduling, personalized learning experiences, and increased interaction, it also poses challenges related to technology dependence, potential learning style mismatches, and difficulties in measuring engagement and providing timely feedback. Through a theoretical lens grounded in constructivist learning theory and active learning principles, the paper explores how the flipped classroom model aligns with contemporary educational theories and practices. Furthermore, practical recommendations are provided for educators looking to implement the flipped classroom model in adult education settings, emphasizing the importance of creating high-quality pre-class materials, promoting active learning and practice, and fostering a supportive learning community. By leveraging the theoretical underpinnings of constructivism and active learning, educators can optimize the flipped classroom model to cater to the unique needs of adult learners, promote engagement, and enhance learning outcomes.

References

. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

. Brame, C. J. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/.

. Chen, F., Lui, A. M., & Martinelli, S. M. (2014). A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Medical Education, 48(12), 1179-1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12513.

. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.

. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA.

. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.

. Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse education today, 38, 15-21.

. Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC medical education, 18(1), 38.

. O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education.

. Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students' learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education.

. Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior.

. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.

. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press.

. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-05