LEARNING STYLES AS A TOOL FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHEMICALENGINEERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/ephijer.v1i2.12Keywords:
Chemical Education Research, Learning TheoriesAbstract
Adaptive and flexible learning environments are expected to be a critical strategic option for the competitiveness ofeducational institutes in the 21stcentury. In a multicultural society, as that of the European Union, as well as in global
(open) educational systems, students have different backgrounds, levels of motivation, attitudes about learning, as wellas preferences and approaches to studying. Therefore, there is a need for educators to identify the factors that supportthe shift from lecture-based teaching to active learning strategies with such variable class audiences. Oneof the most
critical factors is the identification of the students’ learning styles.
This paper focuses on research models of learning styles and comments on the necessity, importance, and some positiveand negative elements of various related approaches.In particular we assess the profile of a class of ChemicalEngineering students who formed our research case study, through a pilot application of one of the approaches. Our
target group was formed by the participants in the elective course “Topics of Information and Knowledge Society”,
offered at the 2ndsemester of the undergraduate curriculum of the School of Chemical Engineering at the NationalTechnical University of Athens (NTUA).
The ultimate purpose of the overall approach was to improve theteaching methodology, course material, andcommunication channels by indexing the students’learning styles in order for the course to be more interesting and useful
to them.
References
. Adeniji KA. Comparative Analysis of Students’ Learning Styles and Mathematics Performance at Tertiary Level in Katsina State, Nigeria. Journal of Educational Foundations and Development. 2015; 1(1): 1-12.
. Aral A and Cataltepe Z. In Learning styles for k-12 mathematics e-learning, Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, CSEDU 2012, Porto Portugal 6th to 18th April 2012.
. Bird S and Sieber JE. Teaching ethics in science and engineering: Effective online education— Introduction. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2005; 11: 323–328.
. Brennan R. One size doesn’t fit all: Pedagogy in the online environment, NCVER. https://www.ncver.edu.au/data/assets/file/0014/4604/nr0f05_1.pdf (accessed Aug 5, 2016).
. Byrne E. Teaching and Learning Styles in Engineering, UCC. International Symposium for Engineering Education; Damastown, Dublin City University, Ireland, 2007.
. Coffield FJ, Moseley DV, Hall E, Ecclestone K. Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review; Learning and Skills Research Center / University of Newcastle upon Tyne: London, UK, 2004.
. Felder RM. On Creating Creative Engineers. Engineering Education. 1987; 77(4): 222-227.
. Felder RM. Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. Journal of College Science Teaching. 1993; 23(5): 286–290.
. Felder RM and Henriques ER. Learning and Teaching Styles in Foreign and Second Language Education. Foreign Language Annals. 1995; 28(1): 21–31.
. Felder RM. Matters of Style. Prism American Society of Engineering Education. 1996; 6(4): 18-23.
. Felder RM and Silverman LK. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education. 1998; 78(7): 674–681.
. Felder RM. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education. 2002; 78(7): 674–681.
. Felder RM and Brent R. Understanding Student Differences. Journal of Engineering Education. 2005; 94(46.1): 57-72.
. Felder RM and Spurlin J. Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2005; 21(1): 103-112.
. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, Wenderoth MP. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.
. PNAS. 2014; 11(23): 8410-8415; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
. Godleski, ES. In Learning Style Compatibility of Engineering Students and Faculty, Proceedings, Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE, Philadelphia, US, 1984.
. Gresham G. An Invitation into the Investigation of the Relationship between Mathematics Anxiety and Learning Styles in Elementary Preservice Teachers, Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice. 2007; (13): 24-33.
. Henry Cl. No One Size Fits All: Universal design strives to teach students with different learning styles. Chem. Eng. News. 2005; 83 (43),:96–98; DOI: 10.1021/cen-v083n043.p096
. Janiki T and Liegle JO. Development and evaluation of a framework for creating Web-based learning module & pedagogical system perspective. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2001; 5(1): 58-84.
. Katsioloudis P and Frantz TD. A Comparative Analysis of Preferred Learning and Teaching Styles for Engineering. Industrial and Technology Education Students and Faculty. Journal of Technology Education. 2012; 23(2): 61-69.
. Keast S. In Learning Styles in mathematics classrooms. Turan JM and Turan KM, (Eds). Making the Difference. MERGA 22nd Annual Conference, Adelaide, AUS, 1999.
. Keefe JW. Learning Style: An Overview, Keefe, JW (Ed). National Association of Secondary School Principals, Reston, Virginia, US, 1979.
. Kolmos A and Holgaard JE. In Learning styles of science and engineering students in problem and project based education. Proceedings of SEFI 2008 Annual Conference, Brussels: European Society for Engineering Education, 2008.
. Kovac J. Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom (Sarasin, Lynne Celli). J. Chem. Educ. 1999: 76(12):1629; Publication Date (Web): December 1, 1999 (Book and Media Review). DOI: 10.1021/ed076p1629.1
. Lawrence G. People Types and Tiger Stripes: A Practical Guide to Learning Styles 3rd edition. Center for Applications of Psychological Type: Gainesville, FL, 1993.
. Litzinger TA, Lee SH, Wise JC, Felder RM. In A Study of the Reliability and Validity of the Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Style. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.
. Livesay GA, Dee KC, Neuman EA, Hites Jr. In L.S. Engineering Student Learning Styles, ASEE Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, June 2002.
. Martsinson MG and Scindler FR. Organizational Visions for Technology Assimilation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1995; 42 (1): 9-18.
. Olivos P, Santos A, Martín S, Canas M, Gómez-Lázaro E, Maya Y. The relationship between learning styles and motivation to transfer of learning in a vocational training program. Suma Psicologica. 2016; 23: 25-32.
. Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork RA. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2008; 9(3):105-119.
. Patrick S. Education Transformation: From One Size Fits All - Student-Centered Learning,
. Social Innovation Journal [Online] 2014, http://www.socialinnovationsjournal.org/sectors/101-innovation/1520-educationtransformation-from-one-size-fits-all-to-student-centered-learning (accessed Jun 07, 2017).
. Pithers RT. Cognitive learning style: a review of the field dependent-field independent approach. Journal of Vocational Education & Training. 2002; 54(1): 117-132; DOI: 10.1080/13636820200200191.
. Ramsden P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education. 1991; 16: 129-150.
. Richardson JTE. What can students perceptions of academic quality tell us? Research using the Course Experience Questionnaire. In Tight M, Mok KH, Huisman J, Morphew CC. (Eds.) The Routledge international handbook of higher education:199-210. London: Routledge (2009).
. Schmeck RR. Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, Plenum Press: New York, N.Y. 1988.
. Shopova T. Digital Literacy of Students and Its Improvement at the University. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science. 2014; 7(2): 26-32; DOI: 10.7160/eriesj.2014.07020.
. Smith LH and Renzulli JS. Learning Style Preferences: A Practical Approach for Classroom Teachers. Theory into Practice. 1984; 23: 44-50.
. Smith PJ. Preparedness for flexible delivery among vocational learners. Distance Education. 2000; 21(1): 29–48.
. Smith PJ and Dalton J. Accommodating learning styles: Relevance and good practice in NCVER. https://www.ncver.edu.au/__data/assets/word_doc/0019/5149/nd3103b.doc (accessed Feb 11, 2016).
. Smith P. Understanding of learning styles among VET practitioners. Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association. [Online] https://avetra.org.au/documents/PA021Smith.pdf [Accessed, May 20, 2016).
. Thomas L, Ratcliffe M, Woodbury J, Jarman E. In Learning styles and performance in the introductory programming sequence, Proceedings of the 33rd SIGSE Technical symposium on Computer Science Education SIGSE '02, ACM Press, Cincinnati, Northern Kentucky, USA, 2002.
. Towns MH. Kolb for Chemists: David A. Kolb and Experiential Learning Theory. J. Chem. Educ. 2001; 78 (8):1107.
. Woods DR, Hrymak AN, Wright HM. Approaches to Learning and Learning Environments in Problem-based vs Lecture-based Learning, Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.
. Woolner P. A Comparison of a Visual-Spatial Approach and a Verbal Approach to Teaching Mathematics, Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen-Norway, July 14-18 2004 (4).
. Wright JC. Authentic Learning Environment in Analytical Chemistry Using Cooperative Methods and Open-Ended Laboratories in Large Lecture Courses. Journal of Chemical Education. 1996; 73(9): 827; DOI: 10.1021/ed073p827.
. Zwanenberg NV and Wilkinson LJ. Felder and Silverman's Index of Learning Styles and Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire: how do they compare and do they predict academic performance? Educational Psychology. 2000; 20(3): 365–381.
. Zywno MS and Waalen J. The effect of hypermedia instruction on achievement and attitudes of students with different learning styles, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Session 1330, Washington, DC.
. Zywno MSA. Contribution of Score Meaning for Felder-Soloman's Index of Learning Style, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, session 2351, American Society for Engineering Education, 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 EPH - International Journal of Educational Research (ISSN: 2208-2204)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
