GENERATION Z IN HIGHER EDUCATION – INVESTIGATING THE PREFERRED MEDIUM OF TEXT IN ACADEMIC READING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/ephijer.v4i3.67Keywords:
Generation Z, text reading strategies, medium of text, academic readingAbstract
According to Nugin et al. (2016) it is not always easy to determine the exact date of birth of every generation as the transitions have been found to be difficult to pinpoint. (9). According to Seemiller and Grace (2015), the representatives of generation Z were born between 1995 to 2010 and have already entered higher education. Reading online has become one of the most widely used sources of knowledge for learners, especially in the academic contexts (Zarrabi, 2015), thus it is not surprising that for generation Z visual media may as well have the most substantial impact whereas internet and smart devices are the main means of communication making it possible for every question to be answered immediately. Teachers nowadays are faced with a somewhat challenging task to meet the information obtaining needs and preferences of the new generation while belonging to the previous generation themselves. In order to cast light into the process of choosing the most suitable methods and materials as well as the devices for the learners of Generation Z, a research was started in Tallinn Health Care College, with an aim to investigate different generations´ text searching and reading strategies. Current article focuses on describing the preferred medium of text among the representatives of Generation Z. An online semi-structured questionnaire was conducted descriptive analysis conducted. The results direct authors toward further research to investigate the strategies of working with texts keeping in mind the characteristics of Generation Z in order to use the mediums and strategies to create effective learning possibilities in higher education.
References
. Ackerman R and Goldsmith M. Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen versus on Paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2011; 17: 18-32.
. Black A. Gen Y: Who They Are and How They Learn. Educational HORIZONS, winter 2010; 92-102.
. Corlett-Rivera K and Hackman T. E-Book Use and Attitudes in the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Education. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 2014; 14: 255-286.
. Eshet-Alkalai Y and Geri N. Does the medium affect the message? The influence of text representation format on critical thinking. Human Systems Management. 2007; 26: 269-279.
. Horsley M, Knight B.A, Huntly H. The role of textbooks and other teaching and learning resources in higher education in Australia: Change and continuity in supporting learning. International Association for Research on Textbooks and Education (IARTEM) eJournal. 2010; 3: 43-61.
. Knight BA. Teachers’ use of textbooks in the digital age. Cogent Education. 2015; 2(1).
. Lim E-L and Hew K. Students’ perceptions of the usefulness of an E-book with annotative and sharing capabilities as a tool for learning: a case study. Innovations in Education & Teaching International. 2014.
. Mizrachi D. Undergraduates’ Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviours. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2015; 41: 301-311.
. Nugin R, Kannike A, Raudsepp M. Generations in Estonia: Contemporary Perspectives on Turbulent Times. Tartu: University of Tartu Press; 2016.
. Palfrey J and Gasser U. Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books. 2008.
. Panto E and Comas-Quinn A. The challenge of open education. Journal of eLearning and Knowledge Society. 2013; 9(1): 1-12.
. Picton I and Clark C. The Impact of eBooks on the Reading Motivation and Reading Skills of Children and Young People: A study of schools using RM Books, London: National Literacy Trust. 2015.
. Quiping AW and Quiping W. Chine Principle of least effort vs Maximum Efficiency: Deriving Zipf-Pareto’s Laws. International Workshop on Statistical Physics and Mathematics for Complex Systems. Xiamen, China. 2020; 15-19.
. Seemiller C and Grace M. Generation Z Goes to College. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
. Sharples M, McAndrew P, Weller M, Ferguson, R, FitzGerald E, Hirst T, Whitelock D. Innovating pedagogy 2012: Exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers. Open University Innovation Report. Milton Keynes: The Open University. 2012.
. Zarrabi, S. Exploring metacognitive online reading strategies of non-native English- speaking translation student. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of San Francisco, U.S; 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 EPH - International Journal of Educational Research (ISSN: 2208-2204)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.