THE INFLUENCE OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT PRACTICES ON STUDENTS’ BEHAVIOURAL ENGAGEMENT AND LEARNING OUTCOMES IN ONLINE HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • Ari Kuncara Widagdo Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ephijer.v10i02.198

Keywords:

formative assessment, behavioural engagement, online higher education, learning analytics, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

The study explored the relationship between formative assessment practices, student's behavioural engagement and learning outcomes in online higher education. Secondary data were used and a quantitative, non-experimental, correlational research design was used. There were no common student identifiers, so two datasets were statistically matched, resulting in a final analytical sample of 3,948 student-course records. The measures of formative assessment practices included assessment completion, assessment type, weighted assessment performance, and on-time submission rate. Behavioural engagement was measured in terms of virtual learning environment (VLE) clicks and active days of learning, while learning outcomes were measured using weighted scores, learning-outcome index and final course results. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlations and multiple linear regression with robust HC3 standard errors were used. A total of seven or more assessments resulted in significantly more platform activity, more active learning days, higher weighted scores, and higher percentage of successful final products of the students who completed this number of assessments compared to those who completed fewer. There was also a positive relationship between on-time submission and engagement and academic performance. These relationships were also statistically significant when demographic, academic and course related characteristics were considered. The results indicate that there is a significant relationship between regular engagement in formative assessment and consistent academic achievement and between timely submission and consistent academic achievement and behavioural engagement. The study, however, was observational and statistically matched, and the findings should be viewed as associations and not causal findings.

References

1.Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M. A., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021). Emergency online learning in low-resource settings: Effective student engagement strategies. Education Sciences, 11(1), 24.

2.Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 126-150.

3.Bergdahl, N., Bond, M., Sjöberg, J., Dougherty, M., & Oxley, E. (2024). Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 63.

4.Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17(1), 1-30.

5.Büchele, S., Feiste, L., Müller, R., & Schürmann, M. (2025). Online self-assessments and student engagement: a causal analysis in university mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 30(18), 26235-26260.

6.Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during COVID-19. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 733554.

7.Grimalt-Álvaro, C., & Usart, M. (2024). Sentiment analysis for formative assessment in higher education: a systematic literature review. Journal of computing in higher education, 36(3), 647-682.

8.Hansen, G. (2020). Formative assessment as a collaborative act. Teachersintention and studentsexperience: Two sides of the same coin, or?. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100904.

9.Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Online Learning, 27(1), 187-218.

10.Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: a systematic review. Educational technology research and development, 68(4), 1961-1990.

11.Kaliisa, R., Misiejuk, K., López-Pernas, S., Khalil, M., & Saqr, M. (2024, March). Have learning analytics dashboards lived up to the hype? A systematic review of impact on students' achievement, motivation, participation and attitude. In Proceedings of the 14th learning analytics and knowledge conference (pp. 295-304).

12.Kaya-Capocci, S., O’Leary, M., & Costello, E. (2022). Towards a framework to support the implementation of digital formative assessment in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(11), 823.

13.Lu, C., & Cutumisu, M. (2022). Online engagement and performance on formative assessments mediate the relationship between attendance and course performance. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 19(1), 2.

14.Martin, F., Sun, T., Turk, M., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2021). A meta-analysis on the effects of synchronous online learning on cognitive and affective educational outcomes. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(3), 205-242.

15.Matcha, W., Uzir, N. A. A., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2019). A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective. IEEE transactions on learning technologies, 13(2), 226-245.

16.Motz, B. A., Quick, J. D., Wernert, J. A., & Miles, T. A. (2021). A pandemic of busywork: Increased online coursework following the transition to remote instruction is associated with reduced academic achievement. Online Learning, 25(1), 70-85.

17.Nguyen, L. (2025). Student performance factors [Data set]. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/lainguyn123/student-performance-factors

18.Roy, A. A. (2025). OULAD dataset trimmed [Data set]. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ankulabhishekroy/oulad-dataset-trimmed

19.Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British journal of educational technology, 53(3), 593-619.

20.Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International journal of educational research, 103, 101602.

21.Sedrakyan, G., Malmberg, J., Verbert, K., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: Designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 105512.

22.Sudakova, N. E., Savina, T. N., Masalimova, A. R., Mikhaylovsky, M. N., Karandeeva, L. G., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2022). Online formative assessment in higher education: Bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 12(3), 209.

23.Tsai, Y. S., Rates, D., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., ... & Gašević, D. (2020). Learning analytics in European higher education—Trends and barriers. Computers & Education, 155, 103933.

24.Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in human behavior, 89, 98-110.

25.Wafubwa, R. (2020). Role of formative assessment in improving students’ motivation: A systematic review of literature. The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 28(1), 17.

26.Wong, B. T. M., & Li, K. C. (2020). A review of learning analytics intervention in higher education (2011–2018). Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 7-28.

27.Zenouzagh Mohammadi, Z., Admiraal, W., & Saab, N. (2025). Empowering students’ agentive engagement through formative assessment in online learning environment.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17