TRUST AND ETHICAL CONCERNS AS PREDICTORS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION AND LEARNING OUTCOMES IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • Dr. Bathina Rajesh Kumar Assistant Professor, Department of English, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram AP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ephijer.v10i02.197

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing higher education through increased personalization in learning, education support, and engagement. Nonetheless, the adoption of AI technology requires the perception of students, especially concerning issues of trust, perceived usefulness, satisfaction, and ethics. This paper assesses the correlation of trust and ethics with AI adoption, investigates the correlation of AI adoption and learning results, and determines the determinants of AI adoption and improvement in learning in higher education students. The quantitative analysis for this study involved the use of AI Tools Usage Analysis in Education dataset obtained from Kaggle. Data from 505 undergraduate and graduate students, based on predetermined selection criteria, were used for the study. The descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regression were used in the analysis, using p < 0.05 for statistical significance. Privacy and plagiarism ethical issues were identified as significant negative predictors of AI usage, while usefulness and satisfaction with the tool positively predicted the intention to use it. Trust in the system, intention to adopt the technology, usefulness, and satisfaction had a positive impact on learning enhancement, while ethical concerns negatively impacted the process. In general, student perception was more important in determining the extent of AI usage and the outcomes of the learning experience than usage characteristics.

References

1.Ab Rahman, N. F., Wang, S. L., Ng, T. F., & Ghoneim, A. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review of machine learning for predicting student performance. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 54(1), 198-221.

2.Al Najdawi, M. H., Shwedeh, F., Mokhtar Abdelmoghies, M., Kitana, A., & Ali, A. (2024). Applying artificial intelligence in predicting educational excellence in higher education institutions: A case study in Jordanian universities. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 7273-7289.

3.Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2024). Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: The role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1209.

4.Alarefi, M., & Alharbi, N. N. (2025). From Intention to Impact: Predictors and Learning Outcomes of AI Tool Adoption Among Saudi University Students. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 13(4), 69-82.

5.Alshammari, S. H., Alrashidi, M. E., Alshammari, M. H., Alshammari, A. E. A., & Alkhwaldi, A. F. (2025). Determinants of student adoption of artificial intelligence applications in higher education. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 35921.

6.Alyoussef, I. Y., Drwish, A. M., Albakheet, F. A., Alhajhoj, R. H., & Al-Mousa, A. A. (2025). AI adoption for collaboration: Factors influencing inclusive learning adoption in higher education. IEEE Access, 13, 81690-81713.

7.Balaskas, S., Tsiantos, V., Chatzifotiou, S., & Rigou, M. (2025). Determinants of ChatGPT adoption intention in higher education: Expanding on TAM with the mediating roles of trust and risk. Information, 16(2), 82.

8.Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3443-3463.

9.Emon, M. M. H., Hassan, F., Nahid, M. H., & Rattanawiboonsom, V. (2023). Predicting adoption intention of artificial intelligence-A study on ChatGPT. AIUB Journal of Science and Engineering, 22(2), 189-196.

10.James, E. E., Sampson, E. A., Usani, N. E., & Inyang, I. B. (2025). A Principal Component Analysis of the Factors Influencing University Students' Trust in AI-Based Educational Technologies. African Journal of Advances in Science and Technology Research, 18(1), 111-141.

11.Khan, S., Mazhar, T., Shahzad, T., Khan, M. A., Rehman, A. U., Saeed, M. M., & Hamam, H. (2025). Harnessing AI for sustainable higher education: Ethical considerations, operational efficiency, and future directions. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 23.

12.Kuleto, V., Ilić, M., Dumangiu, M., Ranković, M., Martins, O. M., Păun, D., & Mihoreanu, L. (2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 13(18), 10424.

13.Marín, Y. R., Caro, O. C., Rituay, A. M. C., Llanos, K. A. G., Perez, D. T., Bardales, E. S., ... & Santos, R. C. (2025). Ethical challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence in university education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(4), 2443-2467.

14.Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023). Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100152.

15.Mohd Rahim, N. I., A. Iahad, N., Yusof, A. F., & A. Al-Sharafi, M. (2022). AI-based chatbots adoption model for higher-education institutions: A hybrid PLS-SEM-neural network modelling approach. Sustainability, 14(19), 12726.

16.Nagy, A. S., Tumiwa, J. R., Arie, F. V., & Erdey, L. (2024). An exploratory study of artificial intelligence adoption in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2386892.

17.Polyportis, A. (2024). A longitudinal study on artificial intelligence adoption: understanding the drivers of ChatGPT usage behavior change in higher education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1324398.

18.Rahiman, H. U., & Kodikal, R. (2024). Revolutionizing education: Artificial intelligence empowered learning in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2293431.

19.Rana, M. M., Siddiqee, M. S., Sakib, M. N., & Ahamed, M. R. (2024). Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework. Heliyon, 10(18).

20.Razzouki, M., Hammou, S. B., & Izenzal, M. (2025). The adoption and effective use of artificial intelligence in Moroccan higher education: the moderating role of trust. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2553829.

21.Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Zahid, H. (2025). Exploring the impact of generative AI-based technologies on learning performance through self-efficacy, fairness & ethics, creativity, and trust in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 3691-3716.

22.Shwedeh, F., Salloum, S. A., Aburayya, A., Fatin, B., Elbadawi, M. A., Al Ghurabli, Z., & Al Dabbagh, T. (2024). AI adoption and educational sustainability in higher education in the UAE. In Artificial intelligence in education: The power and dangers of ChatGPT in the classroom (pp. 201-229). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

23.Ungerer, L., & Slade, S. (2022). Ethical considerations of artificial intelligence in learning analytics in distance education contexts. In Learning analytics in open and distributed learning: Potential and challenges (pp. 105-120). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

24.Vision LangAI. (2016). AI tools usage analysis in education [Data set]. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/visionlangai/ai-tools-usage-analysis-in-education

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17