PREDICTORS OF INCLUSIVE TEACHING PRACTICES: THE ROLE OF TEACHERS' PERCEPTIONS, PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION, AND INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/qgdm9v54Abstract
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) has emerged as an important framework for promoting inclusive education by addressing learner variability, accessibility, participation, and academic outcomes. This review synthesizes recent theoretical and empirical literature on UDL-based pedagogical practices across school, higher education, professional education, and online learning contexts. Using a narrative-integrative review approach, the study examines evidence related to multiple means of engagement, representation, and action and expression, together with technology-supported practices, accessibility, learner participation, and implementation conditions. The findings show that UDL can create more flexible and inclusive learning environments by providing diverse pathways for accessing information, participating in learning activities, and demonstrating knowledge. Reported benefits include improved motivation, engagement, academic achievement, learner autonomy, belonging, and social participation, particularly among students with disabilities and other diverse learning needs. Technology-supported approaches, including digital tools, multimedia resources, learning analytics, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence, further enhance opportunities for accessible, adaptive, and personalized learning. However, the effectiveness of UDL implementation is shaped by several contextual factors, including teacher preparedness, professional development, workload, technological infrastructure, institutional support, and assessment flexibility. The review concludes that UDL provides a strong foundation for inclusive educational practice, but successful implementation requires coordinated pedagogical and institutional support. Further longitudinal, multi-context, and implementation-focused research is needed to evaluate fidelity, scalability, sustainability, and the long-term effects of UDL on diverse student populations and learning outcomes. Such evidence is essential for guiding educators, institutions, and policymakers in developing equitable and sustainable learning environments.
References
1. Barahona, M., David, V., Gallegos, F., Reyes-Rojas, J., Ibaceta-Quijanes, X., & Darwin, S. (2023). Analysing preservice teachers' enactment of the UDL framework to support diverse students in a remote teaching context. System, 114, 103027.
2. Bedir, G. (2022). Teachers’ views on the practices of universal design for learning: Universal design for learning. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(2), 1324-1342.
3. Chick, J. C., Morello, L., & Vance, J. (2025). Universal design for learning as an equity framework: Addressing educational barriers and enablers for diverse non-traditional learners. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1265.
4. Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., & Frey, B. B. (2022a). Effects of coaching on Universal Design for Learning implementation. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 11(4), 414-433.
5. Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., & Frey, B. B. (2022b). Professional development with universal design for learning: Supporting teachers as learners to increase the implementation of UDL. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 22-37.
6. Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., & Frey, B. B. (2024). Universal design for learning: Connecting teacher implementation to student outcomes. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(11), 2458-2474.
7. Dempsey, A. M., Hunt, E., Nolan, Y. M., & Lone, M. (2024). Healthcare students’ awareness of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in anatomy curricula: An Irish single institution-based study. Translational research in anatomy, 37, 100316.
8. Dempsey, A. M., Nolan, Y. M., Lone, M., & Hunt, E. (2023). Examining motivation of first-year undergraduate anatomy students through the lens of universal design for learning (UDL): A single institution study. Medical Science Educator, 33(4), 945-953.
9. Duncan, J., Butler, K., Leonard, C., Foggett, J., Page, A., & Roche, L. (2025). Uncovering challenges in universal design for learning in higher education. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education, 49(2), 94-110.
10. Espada-Chavarria, R., González-Montesino, R. H., López-Bastías, J. L., & Díaz-Vega, M. (2023). Universal design for learning and instruction: Effective strategies for inclusive higher education. Education Sciences, 13(6), 620.
11. Gill, A., Irwin, D., Towey, D., Zhang, Y., Long, P., Sun, L., ... & Zheng, Y. (2024). Implementing Universal Design through augmented-reality game-based learning. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, 100070.
12. Guo, P., & Wang, Z. (2025). Implementation fidelity of universal design for learning and effects on student achievement engagement and belonging. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 45430.
13. Hyatt, S. E., & Owenz, M. B. (2026). Using universal design for learning and artificial intelligence to support students with disabilities. College Teaching, 74(2), 89-96.
14. Javed, H., Hussain, M. A., & Tufail, M. (2024). Effect of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Embedded Project on 5th Grade Students' Academic Achievement in Science Subject. Bulletin of Education and Research, 46(2), 93-106.
15. Kelly, O., Buckley, K., Lieberman, L. J., & Arndt, K. (2022). Universal Design for Learning-A framework for inclusion in Outdoor Learning. Journal of outdoor and environmental education, 25(1), 75-89.
16. Kirsch, B. A., Bryan, T., & Hoferer, D. (2024). Implementing Universal Design for Learning in the higher education science classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 53(2), 135-139.
17. Kotcherlakota, P. S., Stamler, F. L. L., & Howell, P. M. C. (2024). Implementing universal design for learning in nursing education: Faculty perspectives. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 19(1), e138-e144.
18. Lowrey, K. A., Classen, A., & Paprzycki, P. (2023). Results of a One-Day Seminar on Preservice Teachers' Incorporation of the Universal Design for Learning Framework in Lesson Design. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(1), 397-415.
19. Redstone, A. E., & Luo, T. (2024). Empowering learners in higher education: Redesigning an online computer science course through Universal Design for Learning implementation. TechTrends, 68(5), 869-881.
20. Roski, M., Sebastian, R., Ewerth, R., Hoppe, A., & Nehring, A. (2024). Learning analytics and the Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A clustering approach. Computers & Education, 214, 105028.
21. Seymour, M. (2024). Enhancing the online student experience through the application of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to research methods learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2767-2785.
22. Gilleran Stephens, C., Antwi, S. H., & Linnane, S. (2025). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): a framework for re-design of an Environmental Education (EE) outreach program for a more inclusive and impactful Science Festival event. Discover Education, 4(1), 217.
23. Thoma, R., Farassopoulos, N., & Lousta, C. (2023). Teaching STEAM through universal design for learning in early years of primary education: Plugged-in and unplugged activities with emphasis on connectivism learning theory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104210.
24. Beck Wells, M. (2022). Student perspectives on the use of universal design for learning in virtual formats in higher education. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 37.
25. Adom, D., Abroampa, W. K., Amoako, R., Toquero, C. M., & Kquofi, S. (2023). Towards an inclusive pedagogy: Applying the Universal Design for Learning in an introduction to history of global art course in Ghana. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 18(1), 79-97.
26. Almumen, H. A. (2020). Universal design for learning (UDL) across cultures: The application of UDL in Kuwaiti inclusive classrooms. Sage Open, 10(4), 2158244020969674.
27. Carrington, S., Saggers, B., Webster, A., Harper-Hill, K., & Nickerson, J. (2020). What Universal Design for Learning principles, guidelines, and checkpoints are evident in educators’ descriptions of their practice when supporting students on the autism spectrum?. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101583.
28. Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., & Vantieghem, W. (2021a). Toward more inclusive education: An empirical test of the universal design for learning conceptual model among preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(3), 381-395.
29. Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., & Vantieghem, W. (2021b). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs and practices about two inclusive frameworks: Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103503.
30. King-Sears, M. E., & Johnson, T. M. (2020). Universal design for learning chemistry instruction for students with and without learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 207-218.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Prakash Bhadury
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
